Orozco Gabriel Samurai Tree (invariant 3R) 2007 Tempera and gold leaf on woodI went to visit the Tate Modern and the Orozco exhibition, I wasn't sure what to expect from this exhibition, as I had not seen anything by this artist before, so it was quite nice to approach this with no preconcieved ideas or opinions. It was interesting to see a large amount of media that he has used to convey his ideas.
I took my sketchbook round with me and done some quick sketches alongside writing down my first impressions about some of the pieces. I will type up my notes on here so that I can keep the impression fresh without doing any research. These are a few write ups on the pieces that had the most impact on me.
MY HANDS ARE MY HEART 1991
The first piece is a piece of red brick clay squeezed into a shape of a heart, the shape clearly shows the imprints of his hands. It has the appearance of just being squeezed aimlessly without any forethought of the outcome and I did wonder if this was just the result of a happy coincidence. There is a photo of him holding the clay piece over his heart, and the clay piece itself which is enclosed in a glass case. I suppose as an artist this is a statement about his hands which create his works are very much connected to his heart and his love of creating his art. Thats the impression I immediately took from it anyway.
OBIT SERIES 2008
This part of the exhibition was quite intriguing and for a while I was trying to figure out whether each banner was written about the same person. This became obvious when the statements began to contradict themselves. Basically he has taken some lines from the New York Times obituaries, and leaving out the names of the deceased person he has created a line on the banner that sums up each deceased person as they have appeared in the Obituary. I found this quite funny and sad at the same time and it bought to mind how insignificant life can be ,however well known you are your life can still be summed up in five or six little words......
LINTELS 2001
I wasn't sure what to make of this one really. First impressions was one of repulsion actually. Basically he has collected all the fluff and hair from tumble dryers in New York and refelted them all together to form a lint . He has then hung them all on line s which are strung across the gallery, to look like washing lines.
On a deeper level, once I had got over the psychological itching that this piece had managed to provoke. The fluff and hair is all taken from unknown people who may or may not be alive now. It could be considered to be a reminder of the impermenance of everything, but nothing ever completely disappears, there is always something that remains to be changed into something else.
LA DS 1993
This quirky little cart at first glance, just looks a little odd. For some reason it reminded me of a character car from a cartoon or something similar. Closer inspection revealed that it was in fact an old Citroen DS that has had the middle taken out of it and welded back together again. The car no longer has an engine, which generates the paradox of a completely static object, that is aerodynamically built for speed .
SAMURAI TREE INVARIANT PAINTINGS 2006-7
These paintings are really interesting and eyecatching. There are no visible brushstrokes and the colours consist of red, blue ,white and gold. They do give the impression of diagrams and there is an underlying pattern that relates to all three of the paintings where the backgrounds and colours of circles have all been reversed. This is not a a painting as such it is a diagram that seem to represent the branching out of possibilities and responses that are involved in playing any game.
Overall this was an interesting exhibition, I was impressed with the diversity of materials that he had used from painting and photography to the use of found objects and rubbish that have been remoulded and refashioned . This calls into question of how much something which is essentially a piece of rubbish could be considered an item of worth.
Sometimes conceptual art does leave me cold, if it doesn't immediately have a strong visual impact and I have to question too hard to understand it, there is a piece of me that kind of think that it has failed as a visual artwork. I am not going to say that the whole exhibition worked for me there were elements of it that I didn't find particularly engaging, but I would say the majority of it was both interesting to look at visually and it did make me question the underlying concept....











